Strategic optimisation of service systems with cold-standby parts using inventory policy

Zeyu Luo et al.

European Journal of Industrial Engineering2026https://doi.org/10.1504/ejie.2026.151919article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Ensuring the reliability of terminal servers is a cardinal concern in today's business operations, given the potential for system failures and resultant operational interruptions. One efficient strategy that has emerged is using cold standbys, inactive redundant components that spring into action when the primary system falters. There has been a lot of research on queueing systems and how they work with repairable servers, but there is still a clear need to combine these findings with the best way to order standby parts. This paper pioneers the development and detailed study of an M/M/1 queueing model outfitted with cold standby parts, regulated by an (r, q) ordering policy. Our investigation goes a step further, delving into customer behaviours and how server availability influences their strategic decisions, ultimately affecting the service provider's profit margin. By intertwining the principles of queueing systems with inventory theory, we propose a novel model that offers companies a refined strategy to maximise anticipated profit against the backdrop of potential server breakdowns. [Submitted: 17 April 2024; Accepted: 18 April 2025]

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ejie.2026.151919

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{zeyu2026,
  title        = {{Strategic optimisation of service systems with cold-standby parts using inventory policy}},
  author       = {Zeyu Luo et al.},
  journal      = {European Journal of Industrial Engineering},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ejie.2026.151919},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Strategic optimisation of service systems with cold-standby parts using inventory policy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.