Collective Memory Is More Than What We Remember: Quantifying Interconnections

Suparna Rajaram et al.

Current Directions in Psychological Science2026https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214251398487article
AJG 4
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

For more than a century, experimental research on human memory has focused on individuals learning and remembering in isolation; memory scientists began a study of social influences in earnest only in the last 3 decades. A key phenomenon driving this research is collective memory, or defined in cognitive terms, memories that a group of people share. While attention has focused on the overlap in the contents of memory, we focus on deeper representations of these shared memories, namely overlap in their recall organization. Individual memory research has extensively examined how memories become organized, but this is a new arena of research on social remembering. We describe two novel applications of quantitative tools that capture at a global level the overlap in how people organize the contents of their collective memory. These two tools provide different approaches for capturing the ways in which elements become organized and give us holistic views of how people represent the interconnections in memory for a particular episode or theme. This initial research assessing the development of overlapping memory organization offers a stepping stone toward understanding how collective memory narratives and schemata emerge and potential consequences for future learning.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214251398487

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{suparna2026,
  title        = {{Collective Memory Is More Than What We Remember: Quantifying Interconnections}},
  author       = {Suparna Rajaram et al.},
  journal      = {Current Directions in Psychological Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214251398487},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Collective Memory Is More Than What We Remember: Quantifying Interconnections

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.