Multidimensional forecasting in option markets

Dilip B. Madan & King Wang

International Journal of Financial Engineering2026https://doi.org/10.1142/s2424786326500076article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Neural net multidimensional nonlinear prediction technologies are applied to forecasting financial return distributions. This paper reports on neural net prediction technologies applied to data on bilateral gamma distributional parameters obtained from time series and option data. The exercises conducted consider predicting longer maturity risk neutral distributions from their shorter maturity counterparts, predicting tomorrow’s option surface from today’s as synthesized by the Sato process based on the bilateral gamma density at unit time, and physical return distribution of a stock return from the physical distribution for the exchange traded fund for the stock’s sector. It is observed that considerable improvements are offered in predicting longer maturity risk neutral distributions at the lower spectrum of the set of maturities. Improvements are not as pronounced for tomorrow’s surface from today’s. There are improvements for index component physical return density prediction from the distribution of the index.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s2424786326500076

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{dilip2026,
  title        = {{Multidimensional forecasting in option markets}},
  author       = {Dilip B. Madan & King Wang},
  journal      = {International Journal of Financial Engineering},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s2424786326500076},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Multidimensional forecasting in option markets

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.