← Back to results Optimized Scoring Systems: Toward Trust in Machine Learning for Healthcare and Criminal Justice Cynthia Rudin & Berk Ustun
Abstract The authors developed and implemented transparent machine-learning models that call into question the use of black-box machine-learning models in healthcare and criminal justice applications.
117 citations
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2018.0957 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{cynthia2018,
title = {{Optimized Scoring Systems: Toward Trust in Machine Learning for Healthcare and Criminal Justice}},
author = {Cynthia Rudin & Berk Ustun},
journal = {INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics},
year = {2018},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2018.0957},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Optimized Scoring Systems: Toward Trust in Machine Learning for Healthcare and Criminal Justice
AU - Rudin, Cynthia
AU - Ustun, Berk
JO - INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics
PY - 2018
ER - Cynthia Rudin & Berk Ustun (2018). Optimized Scoring Systems: Toward Trust in Machine Learning for Healthcare and Criminal Justice. *INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2018.0957 Cynthia Rudin & Berk Ustun. "Optimized Scoring Systems: Toward Trust in Machine Learning for Healthcare and Criminal Justice." *INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics* (2018). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2018.0957. Optimized Scoring Systems: Toward Trust in Machine Learning for Healthcare and Criminal Justice
Cynthia Rudin & Berk Ustun · INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics · 2018
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2018.0957 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.97 × 0.4 = 0.39 M · momentum 0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.