Closing the Gap in Career Counselor Development With Inclusive Teaching Strategies

Kelley R. Holladay et al.

Journal of Employment Counseling2025https://doi.org/10.1002/joec.12250article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

The researchers sought to explore the developmental experiences of individuals with direct engagement in counseling—specifically counseling students, practitioners, and educators—derived from their participation in a career development course. We invited responses that focused on identifying gaps and offering recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of the course. The participants ( n = 190), all of whom were counseling students, career counseling professionals, and counselor educators, generated 268 statements that were coded by the research team. Four primary themes emerged from the analysis: (1) diversity and social justice; (2) career counseling gaps; (3) career counseling recommendations; and (4) the value of career counseling. Implications for career counseling instruction and counselor education programs are discussed, with a focus on improving training to better serve diverse populations and address evolving career concerns.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/joec.12250

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kelley2025,
  title        = {{Closing the Gap in Career Counselor Development With Inclusive Teaching Strategies}},
  author       = {Kelley R. Holladay et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Employment Counseling},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/joec.12250},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Closing the Gap in Career Counselor Development With Inclusive Teaching Strategies

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.