“I’m Sure He’ll Know His Stuff”: Student Perceptions of Critical White Allyship in Sport Management Education

Samuel M. Clevenger et al.

Sport Management Education Journal2025https://doi.org/10.1123/smej.2024-0008article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Sport management researchers in the United States continue to study the social divisions shaping the field. This includes issues related to diversity, equity, and inclusion in sport management education, as undergraduate programs remain predominantly White and male in terms of students and faculty. This lack of diversity underscores the importance of promoting intersectional and multicultural perspectives within curricula. Given the demographics of the field, White male faculty play a crucial role as allies. However, to date, there has been scant investigation of student perceptions of critical White allyship through instruction and its effectiveness. Therefore, this article presents qualitative research on student perceptions of a White male faculty member’s instruction of a Women in Sport course. Results indicate student engagement with the deliberate ways the instructor worked to denaturalize his privileged identity and offer what students perceived as a credible pedagogical experience. Findings offer insight on how White male faculty can assess, critique, and improve their critical allyship.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1123/smej.2024-0008

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{samuel2025,
  title        = {{“I’m Sure He’ll Know His Stuff”: Student Perceptions of Critical White Allyship in Sport Management Education}},
  author       = {Samuel M. Clevenger et al.},
  journal      = {Sport Management Education Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1123/smej.2024-0008},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

“I’m Sure He’ll Know His Stuff”: Student Perceptions of Critical White Allyship in Sport Management Education

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.