Aggregate productivity effect of labour and capital market distortions in Canada

Yu Chen & Trevor Tombe

Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue Canadienne D'Economique2026https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.70047article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

How efficiently are workers, investment capital, and production distributed across firms in Canada? And how have they varied over time, across regions, and between sectors? To answer these questions, we present novel measures of the degree of resource misallocation over time and space using uniquely detailed firm‐level data (T2‐LEAP) between 2001 and 2015. We find the dispersion of marginal returns to both capital and labour across firms have increased significantly during this period, suggesting allocative efficiency is deteriorating. Using a rich but tractable multi‐sector model of heterogeneous firms, we find that had the misallocation of labour and capital not worsened over our period of analysis, aggregate Canadian productivity would be significantly higher. Worsening allocations between sectors alone accounts for approximately half of the widening productivity gap between Canada and the United States over this period.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.70047

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yu2026,
  title        = {{Aggregate productivity effect of labour and capital market distortions in Canada}},
  author       = {Yu Chen & Trevor Tombe},
  journal      = {Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue Canadienne D'Economique},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.70047},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Aggregate productivity effect of labour and capital market distortions in Canada

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.