arbiter
JournalsAccount

Corrigendum: Theological values and political ideology of upper echelon and international marketing strategy: a conceptual framework

Unknown author

International Marketing Review2026https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-12-2025-0645article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article's, Agnihotri A, Bhattacharya S, Sakka G (2025), “Theological values and political ideology of upper echelon and international marketing strategy: a conceptual framework”. International Marketing Review, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-02-2025-0086 author missed to update the affiliation for the third author Georgia Sakka during the proof stage. The affiliation should read as “Assistant Professor at the University of Limassol, CIIM Business School, University of Limassol, Limassol, Cyprus and GNOSIS Mediterranean Institute for Management Science, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus”. The publisher asks that affiliation be entered correctly at submission and confirmed at article proofing stage.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-12-2025-0645

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Corrigendum: Theological values and political ideology of upper echelon and international marketing strategy: a conceptual framework}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {International Marketing Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-12-2025-0645},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Corrigendum: Theological values and political ideology of upper echelon and international marketing strategy: a conceptual framework

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.