arbiter
JournalsAccount

The evolution of risk attitudes: A panel study of the university years

Catherine C. Eckel et al.

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-025-09457-7article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

We analyze a unique longitudinal dataset of university students to investigate the stability of risk preferences over a five-year period. Our findings indicate that subjects’ risk tolerance, as measured by incentivized lottery choices, tends to increase over time, while it moves in the opposite direction when assessed through a non-incentivized survey question. Furthermore, we exploit the COVID-19 pandemic to explore the impact of negative experiences and emotions on the temporal changes in subjects’ risk preferences. Our analysis reveals that, within the same group of respondents, the risk tolerance elicited by the incentivized measure proves to be more stable, whereas the survey measure exhibits greater sensitivity, declining in response to negative shocks. These results enhance our understanding of how risk preferences evolve over time and emphasize the importance of employing appropriate measurement methods when investigating risk attitudes.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-025-09457-7

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{catherine2025,
  title        = {{The evolution of risk attitudes: A panel study of the university years}},
  author       = {Catherine C. Eckel et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Risk and Uncertainty},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-025-09457-7},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The evolution of risk attitudes: A panel study of the university years

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.