Incentives crowd out voluntary cooperation: evidence from gift-exchange experiments

Simon Gächter et al.

Experimental Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1017/eec.2024.14article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.46

Abstract

Explicit and implicit incentives and opportunities for mutually beneficial voluntary cooperation coexist in many economic relationships. In a series of eight laboratory gift-exchange experiments, we show that incentives can lead to crowding out of voluntary cooperation even after they have been abolished. This crowding-out also occurs in repeated relationships, which otherwise strongly increase effort compared to one-shot interactions. Using a unified econometric framework, we unpack these results as a function of positive and negative reciprocity, as well as the principals’ wage offer and the incentive compatibility of the contract. Crowding-out occurs mostly due to reduced wages and not a change in reciprocal wage–effort relationships. Our systematic analysis also replicates established results on gift exchange, incentives, and crowding out of voluntary cooperation while being exposed to incentives. Overall, our findings show that the behavioral consequences of explicit incentives strongly depend on the features of the situation in which they are embedded.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/eec.2024.14

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{simon2025,
  title        = {{Incentives crowd out voluntary cooperation: evidence from gift-exchange experiments}},
  author       = {Simon Gächter et al.},
  journal      = {Experimental Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/eec.2024.14},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Incentives crowd out voluntary cooperation: evidence from gift-exchange experiments

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.