Field work gaps: digital twin modeling intervention – a moderated-mediation model

Stewart Selase Hevi et al.

The Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning2025https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-04-2025-0081article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Purpose This article investigates the moderated-mediation roles of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, as well as, digital competency between digital twin modeling experience and continuous use among built environment students in Ghanaian technical universities. Design/methodology/approach 788 students in the faculty of built environment were deployed through stratification from six technical universities in Ghana. Regression analysis was used to examine the conjectured paths. Findings The study outcome shows that digital competency moderates the mediated link between perceived usefulness and students’ continuous use; however, the moderated mediation role of perceived ease of use was not supported. Research limitations/implications Generalizability of the study outcomes was methodologically delimited as the survey was restricted to only students in built environment faculties in Ghanaian technical universities. Originality/value Uniqueness of the research is entrenched as it is one of the first studies to explore digital twin modeling experiences of built environment students in technical universities in sub-Saharan Africa.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-04-2025-0081

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{stewart2025,
  title        = {{Field work gaps: digital twin modeling intervention – a moderated-mediation model}},
  author       = {Stewart Selase Hevi et al.},
  journal      = {The Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-04-2025-0081},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Field work gaps: digital twin modeling intervention – a moderated-mediation model

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.