Habitus of doubt? The role of social class narcissism in shaping psychological help conspiracy beliefs

Zuzanna Molenda et al.

British Journal of Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70071article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Collective narcissism is known to fuel anti-scientific attitudes. However, its role in shaping conspiracy beliefs portraying those who use psychology to help others as manipulative or controlling remains largely unexplored. We argue that social class narcissism (i.e., exaggerated belief in the superiority of one's social group, along with sensitivity to criticism and hostility towards other groups) would foster psychological help conspiracy beliefs. Across three cross-sectional studies (N = 1863) among Polish and American participants, social class narcissism correlated with stronger psychological help conspiracy beliefs. In an experimental Study 2 (N = 1371), primed social class narcissism increased such beliefs. The last two studies further showed that social class narcissism was linked to negative attitudes towards psychological help via higher psychological help conspiracy beliefs (Studies 3-4) and lower mental health literacy (Study 4). Our findings highlight the importance of incorporating social identities into interventions targeting anti-scientific attitudes in psychology.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70071

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{zuzanna2026,
  title        = {{Habitus of doubt? The role of social class narcissism in shaping psychological help conspiracy beliefs}},
  author       = {Zuzanna Molenda et al.},
  journal      = {British Journal of Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70071},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Habitus of doubt? The role of social class narcissism in shaping psychological help conspiracy beliefs

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.