Development of a nurse scheduling program using robotic process automation in Korea

Sun Young Jung et al.

Health Informatics Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251414581article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

<b>Background:</b> Effective nurse scheduling promotes patient safety, nurse well-being, and compliance with regulations. <b>Objective:</b> To develop and evaluate a robotic process automation (RPA)-based scheduling system to improve accuracy, reflect nurse preferences, and align with national guidelines. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 102 nurses from a 500-bed hospital were assigned to the experimental or control group. The RPA system was integrated into nurse managers' workflows to automate monthly shift planning. Nurses submitted shift preferences and the system generated schedules accordingly. Pre- and post-intervention data on work characteristics, health status, and work-life balance were analyzed using chi-square and paired t-tests with SPSS. <b>Results:</b> The RPA-based scheduling significantly improved nurses' work-life balance. No significant differences were found in health status or work characteristics. <b>Conclusion:</b> Integrating RPA into nurse scheduling can enhance work-life balance and support fairer scheduling practices. Broader organizational adoption and supportive policies are recommended to ensure sustainable impact and improved care quality.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251414581

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sun2026,
  title        = {{Development of a nurse scheduling program using robotic process automation in Korea}},
  author       = {Sun Young Jung et al.},
  journal      = {Health Informatics Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251414581},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Development of a nurse scheduling program using robotic process automation in Korea

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.