arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Mental health in preprofessional and professional circus artists: A narrative review.

Melanie I. Stuckey et al.

Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology2025https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000391article
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Mental health has received little attention in preprofessional and professional circus despite the performance demands, cognitive skill, and emotional labor required. This review aimed to consolidate the literature, identify research gaps, and guide practice priorities for mental health in preprofessional and professional circus artists. A narrative review of the literature was conducted based on the International Olympic Committee’s 2019 consensus statement for mental health in elite athletes. Articles reported on mental health symptoms and disorders (n = 13) and interventions (n = 3) in preprofessional and professional circus contexts. Circus artists may experience more symptoms of depression, anxiety, fatigue, and disordered eating compared to the general population. Mental health symptoms may be related to discipline, age, gender, professional status, coping resources, environmental demands, and injury. There is insufficient evidence to support the development of best practice guidelines; however, multidisciplinary collaboration to support mental health appears to be important for preprofessional and professional circus artists.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000391

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{melanie2025,
  title        = {{Mental health in preprofessional and professional circus artists: A narrative review.}},
  author       = {Melanie I. Stuckey et al.},
  journal      = {Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000391},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Mental health in preprofessional and professional circus artists: A narrative review.

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.