Who you ask matters: Combining perspective taking and outsidership to identify novel and useful opportunities

Shelby Meek & Matthias Alfred Tietz

International Small Business Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426251395556article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Perspective taking is widely recognised as a valuable cognitive trait in entrepreneurship, particularly for identifying high-quality opportunities. However, its effectiveness may depend on the social embeddedness of the individual; specifically, whether they are organisational insiders or outsiders. This article integrates perspective taking with outsidership to examine how these factors jointly influence the novelty and usefulness of identified opportunities. Across three experimental studies, we find that insiders who engage in perspective taking tend to identify more useful opportunities, while outsiders generate more novel ones. Study 3 further reveals that perspective taking moderates the effects of outsidership, enabling both insiders and outsiders to identify opportunities that are simultaneously more novel and useful. Notably, perspective taking helps outsiders overcome the typical limitation of their position to enhance the perceived usefulness of their ideas and also helps outsiders have their ideas perceived as relatively more novel. These findings advance entrepreneurship research by clarifying the distinct roles of social positioning and perspective taking in opportunity identification and offer practical guidance for organisations seeking to generate innovative ideas.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426251395556

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shelby2026,
  title        = {{Who you ask matters: Combining perspective taking and outsidership to identify novel and useful opportunities}},
  author       = {Shelby Meek & Matthias Alfred Tietz},
  journal      = {International Small Business Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426251395556},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Who you ask matters: Combining perspective taking and outsidership to identify novel and useful opportunities

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.