Failure in Sport for Development and Peace

Per G. Svensson et al.

Journal of Sport Management2025https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2024-0438article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.44

Abstract

Sport for development and peace (SDP) organizations aim to use sport as a means of fostering a range of positive societal outcomes, yet researchers have suggested that existing research and evaluative practices are troublesome with minimal reporting around mistakes and unintended negative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to explore the notion of failure in SDP from practitioners’ perspectives. Data were collected from 28 SDP leaders through semistructured interviews. The findings highlight how practitioners define failure in the context of SDP, their experiences of failure, and the lessons learned from those experiences. Furthermore, a set of strategies were identified for how SDP leaders can manage failure to stimulate learning and innovation, which can improve program outcomes and sustainability. The findings also have critical implications for funders and support agencies to transform existing funding systems and processes to be more receptive to the inherent uncertainty involved in SDP work.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2024-0438

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{per2025,
  title        = {{Failure in Sport for Development and Peace}},
  author       = {Per G. Svensson et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Sport Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2024-0438},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Failure in Sport for Development and Peace

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.