Taming Cycles: China's Growth Targets and Macroeconomic Management

Jeffery (Jinfan) Chang et al.

Brookings Papers on Economic Activity2025https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2025.a978546article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

ABSTRACT: China's hybrid economy blends state planning with market mechanisms, using annual economic targets to guide development and macroeconomic management to ensure their achievement. Local governments set ambitious growth targets to align with central mandates and incentivize subordinates, leading to asymmetric adjustments: Targets rise rapidly during booms but decline sluggishly during slowdowns. This dynamic has heightened pressure on local governments to intervene in the economy, particularly after 2010. Our analysis shows that when a region falls short of its growth target, it increases infrastructure investment, land sales, and local government debt to close the gap. Notably, during the relatively stable period of 2011–2019, overly optimistic targets contributed an additional 14.0 percent of GDP to local government debt. While these interventions helped smooth cyclical fluctuations and moderated the trend of GDP deceleration, they also eroded GDP growth's reliability as an economic indicator, weakening its correlation with corporate revenue, household demand, and total factor productivity gains.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2025.a978546

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jeffery2025,
  title        = {{Taming Cycles: China's Growth Targets and Macroeconomic Management}},
  author       = {Jeffery (Jinfan) Chang et al.},
  journal      = {Brookings Papers on Economic Activity},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2025.a978546},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Taming Cycles: China's Growth Targets and Macroeconomic Management

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.