Creating cool: The crafting, development, and management of cool brands

Geraldo Matos et al.

Journal of Global Fashion Marketing2025https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2024.2431961article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.44

Abstract

For a brand, being cool can be an important driver of consumer purchase, yet little is known about how marketers can make a brand cool. This study aims to understand how cool brands are created and maintained. To this end, this paper leverages qualitative and quantitative studies to determine how cool brands are created, and in turn, develops a formative scale for measuring brand coolness. More specifically, in-depth interviews were conducted with 19 high-level sportswear/streetwear marketing practitioners to identify the five key drivers of coolness—Authenticity, Associations, Originality, Storytelling, and Accessibility. Based on these findings, a reliable and valid formative scale for cool is constructed which is shown to have a causal relationship with pre-existing (reflective) measures of cool. Further, these measures are demonstrated to influence consumers’ perception of brands and capture meanings and drivers of cool(ness) not previously identified. As the first study to explore marketers’ role in the cultural production of cool and the formative measures for cool, the findings provide valuable insights regarding how managers attempt to imbue their brands with cool.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2024.2431961

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{geraldo2025,
  title        = {{Creating cool: The crafting, development, and management of cool brands}},
  author       = {Geraldo Matos et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Global Fashion Marketing},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2024.2431961},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Creating cool: The crafting, development, and management of cool brands

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.