arbiter
JournalsAccount

Enough to Last? Subjective Financial Well‐Being in Retirement: The Role of Beliefs, Emotions, and Behaviors

Jody Evans & Teagan Altschwager

International Journal of Consumer Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70207article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Population aging raises important questions about retirees' subjective financial well‐being (SFWB). Yet most research focuses on wealth accumulation, overlooking how SFWB unfolds during the decumulation stage of life. This study explores how SFWB manifests during retirement and the individual and ecosystem factors that influence it. Through focus groups and interviews with 272 Australian participants, including retirees and ecosystem members, we develop a dynamic tri‐component framework in which beliefs, emotions, and behaviors shape SFWB. We show that SFWB in retirement is not a static assessment of financial resources, but an evolving system that is influenced by unexpected life events, policy changes, planning engagement, and media narratives. Interventions like lifestyle‐based planning and scenario modelling can help retirees move from uncertainty and fear toward confidence and financial resilience. Our study extends prior models of FWB and offers practical pathways for supporting retirees through integrated cognitive, emotional, and behavioral strategies.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70207

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jody2026,
  title        = {{Enough to Last? Subjective Financial Well‐Being in Retirement: The Role of Beliefs, Emotions, and Behaviors}},
  author       = {Jody Evans & Teagan Altschwager},
  journal      = {International Journal of Consumer Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70207},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Enough to Last? Subjective Financial Well‐Being in Retirement: The Role of Beliefs, Emotions, and Behaviors

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.