arbiter
JournalsAccount

Forecasting GDP growth with stock returns: Time-series or cross-sectional information?

Hiroshi Morita

Economics Letters2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2026.112946article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper investigates whether the predictive content of stock-market information for macroeconomic activity reflects high-frequency time-series dynamics or cross-sectional aggregation. Using a factor-augmented mixed-data sampling (MIDAS) framework applied to Japan, we find that aggregate market indices and high-frequency variation provide limited forecasting gains, whereas factor-based predictors extracted from large cross-sections of individual stock returns can improve forecast accuracy relative to an autoregressive benchmark. Overall, the results suggest that the informational value of stock prices for GDP forecasting arises primarily from effective cross-sectional aggregation rather than from higher-frequency variation. • Stock returns contain useful information for forecasting Japan’s GDP growth. • Forecast gains are selective and concentrated at the one-quarter horizon. • MIDAS yields little extra gain over quarterly stock-return specifications. • Factor-based models outperform models based on aggregate stock indices. • Cross-sectional aggregation matters more than high-frequency variation.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2026.112946

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hiroshi2026,
  title        = {{Forecasting GDP growth with stock returns: Time-series or cross-sectional information?}},
  author       = {Hiroshi Morita},
  journal      = {Economics Letters},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2026.112946},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Forecasting GDP growth with stock returns: Time-series or cross-sectional information?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.