“Am I Different?” The Unseen Divide of Communication Overaccommodation and Its Effect on Employees’ Sense of Belonging and Job Satisfaction

Xiaowen Chen et al.

Management International Review2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-025-00600-9article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study investigates non-native English-speaking employees’ perceptions of communication accommodation (CA) from their native-speaking colleagues in culturally and linguistically diverse workplaces, the impact of these perceptions on their sense of belonging and job satisfaction, and the moderating role of lingua franca proficiency. Survey data from 169 non-native English-speaking employees indicate that CA is often perceived as overaccommodation, which negatively affects their sense of belonging and job satisfaction. Lingua franca proficiency moderates these relationships. Perception of specific CA behaviors varies, with speech mimicry and speaking in a louder voice identified as the most offensive behaviors. Moreover, CA behaviors demonstrate distinct patterns of association with job satisfaction, belongingness, and lingua franca proficiency. These findings highlight the importance of communication management in intercultural work environments, including accommodation needs assessment and CA training.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-025-00600-9

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{xiaowen2026,
  title        = {{“Am I Different?” The Unseen Divide of Communication Overaccommodation and Its Effect on Employees’ Sense of Belonging and Job Satisfaction}},
  author       = {Xiaowen Chen et al.},
  journal      = {Management International Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-025-00600-9},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

“Am I Different?” The Unseen Divide of Communication Overaccommodation and Its Effect on Employees’ Sense of Belonging and Job Satisfaction

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.