Who Returned During the Pandemic? Migration Strategies Among Kyrgyz Labor Migrants in Russia

Erin Trouth Hofmann et al.

International Migration2026https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70150article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The Russia‐Central Asia migration system was among the most strongly affected migration systems in the COVID‐19 pandemic. To understand how migrants made decisions in this unusual situation and how their strategies were influenced by gender, marriage, employment, and other factors, we analysed interviews with 36 labor migrants in Kyrgyzstan. Women, including those who were previously interested in long‐term migration, were most interested in return and were more able to access emergency transportation, but had less access to information about the pandemic. For most respondents, continued circular migration still appeared to be the best response to the hardships created by the pandemic, highlighting the durability of migration systems. However, some respondents changed their long‐term plans. Raising children abroad was an important driver of changed plans, as migrant mothers who had previously been committed to staying abroad returned home due to lack of social support during the pandemic.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70150

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{erin2026,
  title        = {{Who Returned During the Pandemic? Migration Strategies Among Kyrgyz Labor Migrants in Russia}},
  author       = {Erin Trouth Hofmann et al.},
  journal      = {International Migration},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70150},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Who Returned During the Pandemic? Migration Strategies Among Kyrgyz Labor Migrants in Russia

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.