Navigating Talent Management Paradoxes: Work Experiences of Autistic Employees and Their Coworkers

Michal Waisman‐Nitzan et al.

Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources2026https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.70066article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Inclusive management practices foster workplace diversity and inclusion. However, despite increasing interest in neurodiversity, autistic employment remains underexplored in talent management (TM) research. Talent management involves three core tensions: inclusive–exclusive, innate–acquired, and universal–context‐dependent. We explored the dyadic perceptions and daily experiences of autistic employees and their coworkers, and what these perspectives reveal about TM and inclusive practices. We conducted 32 semistructured interviews with 16 dyads of autistic employees and their coworkers in Australia and Israel. We analyzed data using interpretative phenomenological and dyadic approaches. Drawing on the cohesive management capability framework and double‐empathy problem, four themes emerged: performance and contribution, identity and needs, sense of belonging, and communication and transparency. Supporting autistic employees requires inclusive, acquired, and con‐sensitive TM practices. Implications include aligning talents with job requirements, providing communication training to bridge the double‐empathy gap, extending accommodations organization‐wide, and implementing transparent, inclusive policies.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.70066

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{michal2026,
  title        = {{Navigating Talent Management Paradoxes: Work Experiences of Autistic Employees and Their Coworkers}},
  author       = {Michal Waisman‐Nitzan et al.},
  journal      = {Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.70066},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Navigating Talent Management Paradoxes: Work Experiences of Autistic Employees and Their Coworkers

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.