arbiter
JournalsAccount

Rethinking the Urban–Rural Divide: Economic Growth in America's Heartland

Marley Randazzo & Elizabeth Currid‐Halkett

Economic Development Quarterly2025https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424241310872article
ABDC B
Weight
0.46

Abstract

Recent economic development literature and popular media tend to describe rural America as mired in a state of socioeconomic decay, unable to break the vicious cycle kicked off by deindustrialization and sustained by brain drain. However, an emerging body of literature challenges these totalizing views, emphasizing the need for greater attention and nuance in rural economic research. This commentary adds to this topic, examining sector employment data over the 1991–2020 period by metropolitan and rural geographies to assess economic development in the nation's Heartland. Overall, the authors find surprising job growth rates in knowledge industries more typically associated with cities and urban agglomerations. In addition, this commentary strengthens existing findings that the nature of official metropolitan classifications erodes rural economic vitality and contributes to pervasive “left behind” narratives.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424241310872

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{marley2025,
  title        = {{Rethinking the Urban–Rural Divide: Economic Growth in America's Heartland}},
  author       = {Marley Randazzo & Elizabeth Currid‐Halkett},
  journal      = {Economic Development Quarterly},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424241310872},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Rethinking the Urban–Rural Divide: Economic Growth in America's Heartland

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.