The effect of auditors’ informal communication on manager behavior

Emily Kathryn Deng

Review of Accounting Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-026-09939-2article
FT50AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Auditors informally communicate with both client managers and fellow audit team members throughout an audit. I examine the separate effects of these informal communications on managers’ strategic behavior using a laboratory experiment in which participants in the roles of auditors and managers interact in a stylized audit setting. I find that informal auditor-manager communication strengthens managers’ social bonds with auditors, which results in fewer aggressive accounting choices by the manager. Moreover, these stronger social bonds result in greater honesty about aggressive accounting choices when they do occur. While informal communication causes auditors to reduce audit effort, I show that the auditors’ choice is appropriate because of the positive influence the managers’ social bonds have on manager behavior, ultimately reducing instances of audit failure. My study demonstrates that auditors can strategically use informal communication with managers to strengthen auditor-manager social bonds that in turn benefit the audit through preferable manager behaviors.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-026-09939-2

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{emily2026,
  title        = {{The effect of auditors’ informal communication on manager behavior}},
  author       = {Emily Kathryn Deng},
  journal      = {Review of Accounting Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-026-09939-2},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The effect of auditors’ informal communication on manager behavior

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.