From social movements to organizational roles: a study of evolving occupational mandates of ESG analysts

Г Р Хамидуллина & David Brock

Journal of Professions and Organization2025https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joae017article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

This study investigates the professionalization processes that accompany the integration of external mandates into mainstream organizations. In response to evolving societal pressures, organizations often create roles specifically tasked with developing practices that align with these external demands. Using the case of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) analysts in asset management companies, this longitudinal study examines the evolution of the ESG analysts’ occupational mandate through three distinct phases. Our findings reveal that ESG analysts’ mandates have developed along technical and normative dimensions, reflecting shifts in both required skills and professional ethos. This study contributes to the professionalization literature by illustrating how external mandates are reinterpreted and adapted within organizational settings.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joae017

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{г2025,
  title        = {{From social movements to organizational roles: a study of evolving occupational mandates of ESG analysts}},
  author       = {Г Р Хамидуллина & David Brock},
  journal      = {Journal of Professions and Organization},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joae017},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

From social movements to organizational roles: a study of evolving occupational mandates of ESG analysts

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.