arbiter
JournalsAccount

Mutual Fund Flows and Performance in Rational Markets (Revisited)

Heber Farnsworth

Critical Finance Review2025https://doi.org/10.1561/104.00000149article
AJG 1ABDC A*
Weight
0.36

Abstract

In Berk and Green (2004), diseconomies of scale in asset management combined with performance-driven flows drive expected excess returns to zero at the optimal fund size. However this model incorrectly accounts for variations away from the optimal size due to investment returns. In this paper I explain the errors in Berk and Green (2004) and present an alternative model in which managers profess to have skill at identifying expected returns based on public information. Updating about whether managers possess this skill leads to contracts and performance/flow relationships which conform with those we observe. The model allows competition among managers and so, in general, updating depends not only on performance relative to a benchmark but relative to a peer group also.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/104.00000149

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{heber2025,
  title        = {{Mutual Fund Flows and Performance in Rational Markets (Revisited)}},
  author       = {Heber Farnsworth},
  journal      = {Critical Finance Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/104.00000149},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Mutual Fund Flows and Performance in Rational Markets (Revisited)

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.36

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.