Corrigendum: Individual intellectual capital, creative process engagement and information security policy compliance

Unknown author

Journal of Intellectual Capital2026https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-03-2026-0170article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article, Hong Y, Chen T, Zhang Y (2025), “Individual intellectual capital, creative process engagement and information security policy compliance”. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 26 No. 6 pp. 1233-1256, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-04-2025-0141, included an inconsistency between the text and the values in Table 9 in the “4.2 Analysis of the structural model” section.The sentence “The negligible effect of IIC on ISPC (f2 = 0.00) was mediated entirely by CPE and CKN, where CPE dominated (f2 = 0.94) and CKN contributed marginally (f2 = 0.05)” should read “The negligible effect of IIC on ISPC (f2 = 0.00) was mediated entirely by CPE and CKN, where CKN dominated (f2 = 0.94) and CPE contributed marginally (f2 = 0.05)”.The publisher asks that values be entered correctly at submission and confirmed at the article proofing stage.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-03-2026-0170

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Corrigendum: Individual intellectual capital, creative process engagement and information security policy compliance}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {Journal of Intellectual Capital},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-03-2026-0170},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Corrigendum: Individual intellectual capital, creative process engagement and information security policy compliance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.