Innovative Agility: Orchestrating Purpose, Practice, and Responsiveness

Alexandre Luna et al.

Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management2025https://doi.org/10.4301/s1807-1775202522010article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This article introduces Innovative Agility as a dynamic capability essential for sustainable innovation in volatile and complex environments. It explores the synergy between agility and innovation, emphasizing the strategic role of agile governance in aligning organizational responses with evolving challenges. The article presents MAnGve-i9 (Mi9), a framework designed to manage innovation in science, technology, and innovation (STI) ecosystems. Developed through Design Science Research, Mi9 integrates agile governance principles and iterative workflows across four cycles: Ideation, Design, Development, and Evaluation. Grounded in Agile Governance Theory, the article frames agility as a socio-technical phenomenon, supporting strategic adaptability. It concludes by framing Innovative Agility as a paradigm for organizations seeking resilience, relevance, and long-term growth.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4301/s1807-1775202522010

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alexandre2025,
  title        = {{Innovative Agility: Orchestrating Purpose, Practice, and Responsiveness}},
  author       = {Alexandre Luna et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4301/s1807-1775202522010},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Innovative Agility: Orchestrating Purpose, Practice, and Responsiveness

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.