Pricing decision and coordination mechanism of dual-channel supply chain dominated by a risk-aversion retailer under demand disruption

Bo Yan et al.

RAIRO - Operations Research2021https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2021013article
AJG 1
Weight
0.57

What the paper says

This paper studies a dual-channel supply chain composed of a retailer and a supplier, and discusses the optimal decisions of supply chain participants under decentralized decision-making without and with demand disruption, respectively. By comparing the optimal decisions in the two scenarios, we find that the optimal decision after demand disruption is a linear function of the demand disruption plus optimal decision before demand disruption. Additionally, when the demand disruption is in interval (− ψu 2 , ψu 1 ), the optimal total production of the supply chain is equal before and after demand disruption. Moreover, the profits of the supply chain members and the value of their recognizing demand disruption are largely affected by the scale of demand disruption. Finally, the results show that the improved revenue-sharing contract can effectively improve the supply chain performance.

20 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2021013

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{bo2021,
  title        = {{Pricing decision and coordination mechanism of dual-channel supply chain dominated by a risk-aversion retailer under demand disruption}},
  author       = {Bo Yan et al.},
  journal      = {RAIRO - Operations Research},
  year         = {2021},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2021013},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Pricing decision and coordination mechanism of dual-channel supply chain dominated by a risk-aversion retailer under demand disruption

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.57

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.57 × 0.4 = 0.23
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.