Actors, agency and accounting: From colonialism to global neo-liberalism

Sami Sadaka & Julian Fares

Accounting History2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732251412863article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of how the accounting profession evolves and develops in relation to analytical postures of colonialism and globalisation. Whilst these postures have been addressed in the literature as complementary, this article analyses them as two separate periods, whereby the influence of globalisation took over the influence of colonialism. The article investigates the agential possibility of local actors in instituting a change in the local accounting profession across the two periods. By empirically examining the case of the accounting profession in Lebanon, an Asian, Middle Eastern, and former French colony, this article aims to rethink the essence of the colonial legacy, provide an alternative understanding of the coloniser–colonised relationships and investigate how global neo-liberalism took the upper hand in influencing the local accounting profession. This marks a transition from a diminishing colonial influence towards a dominating global neo-liberal influence.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732251412863

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sami2026,
  title        = {{Actors, agency and accounting: From colonialism to global neo-liberalism}},
  author       = {Sami Sadaka & Julian Fares},
  journal      = {Accounting History},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732251412863},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Actors, agency and accounting: From colonialism to global neo-liberalism

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.