Using an Asymmetric Loss Function to Alleviate the Risk of Loan Collateral Overvaluation

C. P. Lee

International Real Estate Review2025https://doi.org/10.53383/100397article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Financial institutions are increasingly adopting machine learning-based valuation models to evaluate loan collaterals. However, most machine learning algorithms do not differentiate between the risks associated with the undervaluation and overvaluation of such assets. From the perspective of a lender, the risks of overvaluing loan collateral are more critical than those that arise from undervaluing them. In this study, we alleviate this risk of overvaluation by explicitly considering an asymmetric loss function. We customize a gradient boosting machine (GBM) by specifying an asymmetric loss function, and assigning a higher penalty for overvaluation. This customized GBM is then used to predict house prices in Gimhae, South Korea. The results show that the GBM effectively reduces overvaluation while maintaining prediction accuracy. Researchers and practitioners need to intentionally bias their machine learning algorithms to incorporate the asymmetric risks associated with their businesses. The approach proposed in this study can help stakeholders make informed decisions in the lending process, thereby mitigating the risk of default by borrowers, and ultimately promoting sustainable lending practices.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53383/100397

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{c.2025,
  title        = {{Using an Asymmetric Loss Function to Alleviate the Risk of Loan Collateral Overvaluation}},
  author       = {C. P. Lee},
  journal      = {International Real Estate Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53383/100397},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Using an Asymmetric Loss Function to Alleviate the Risk of Loan Collateral Overvaluation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.