Intercity coopetition and regional innovation: The role of urban polycentricity

Yuting Yang et al.

Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space2026https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x251401439article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Intercity coopetition—the dynamic interplay between cooperation and competition—is central to regional innovation, enabling knowledge exchange across cities. However, the spatial organization of these dynamics among functionally diverse cities and their implications for regional innovation outcomes remain underexplored. This study examines how urban polycentricity, captured through the balance of intercity coopetition relations, affects regional innovation performance. Methodologically, we develop an intercity coopetition index that incorporates both geographical overlap in collaboration networks and technological proximity. Empirically, we draw on longitudinal patent co-application data from nineteen Chinese urban regions between 1990 and 2022. Using fixed effect and instrumental variables models, we find that a balance in cooperation alone has a negative effect on regional innovation. In contrast, regional innovation performance is driven by the interaction between the strength of competitive ties and the balance of competition across cities. We conclude by discussing the policy implications of these findings for fostering spatially coordinated innovation systems.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x251401439

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yuting2026,
  title        = {{Intercity coopetition and regional innovation: The role of urban polycentricity}},
  author       = {Yuting Yang et al.},
  journal      = {Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x251401439},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Intercity coopetition and regional innovation: The role of urban polycentricity

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.