Debating the Malayan Emergency: The new orthodoxy and competing interpretations

Richard Stubbs

Journal of Southeast Asian Studies2024https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022463424000444article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Studies of the Malayan Emergency (1948–1960) over the last dozen years or so have seen the rise to prominence of a new orthodoxy to explain its outcome. This new orthodoxy argues that population control under the Briggs Plan's resettlement programme (mid-1950 to mid-1952) became increasingly effective and was the principal reason that the Malayan Communist Party was forced to change policy by issuing the October 1951 Resolutions. These events, it is contended, turned the tide in the fighting and led to the government's eventual victory. Paying particular attention to the sources used, this analysis shows how the research of a wide range of scholars over the years since the end of the Emergency, challenges the core propositions of the new orthodoxy. The analysis also illustrates that the focus on the new orthodoxy has inhibited the examination of alternative explanations for the course and result of the Emergency, which could usefully be explored.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022463424000444

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{richard2024,
  title        = {{Debating the Malayan Emergency: The new orthodoxy and competing interpretations}},
  author       = {Richard Stubbs},
  journal      = {Journal of Southeast Asian Studies},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022463424000444},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Debating the Malayan Emergency: The new orthodoxy and competing interpretations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.49 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.