arbiter
JournalsAccount

Insider to what? A dynamic analysis of freelancers' perceived insider/outsider status through the lens of the psychological contract

Thomas Gigant et al.

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70105article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Do freelancers feel they are insiders or outsiders in relation to organizations? In this study, we establish that both options may apply. The analysis of two waves of qualitative interviews indicates that highly skilled freelancers felt they were outsiders to client organizations and thus built explicit transactional psychological contracts to underline their position. Simultaneously, they perceived themselves as insiders to project teams, with whom they built open‐ended relational psychological contracts. Herein, we explain how and why this dual‐perceived insider status emerges, and we argue that it helps freelancers manage a distinctive challenge inherent in contract work, namely, the tension between being an independent actor and simultaneously integrating within a team.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70105

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{thomas2026,
  title        = {{Insider to what? A dynamic analysis of freelancers' perceived insider/outsider status through the lens of the psychological contract}},
  author       = {Thomas Gigant et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70105},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Insider to what? A dynamic analysis of freelancers' perceived insider/outsider status through the lens of the psychological contract

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.