Entrepreneurial founding activities that create gazelles

D J Cunneen & G. G. Meredith

Small Enterprise Research2007https://doi.org/10.5172/ser.15.1.39article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

This paper outlines the results of a theory-building study into founding episode activities undertaken by independent entrepreneurs to create extremely high growth Australian firms, known as “gazelles”. Studies suggest gazelles are a rare but particularly important subset of all new firms created each year, contributing significantly to national economic and social development. The study revealed that entrepreneurs who created gazelles, pursued certain founding activities in different ways to entrepreneurs who created other types of growth firms. Findings of systematic differences in the way entrepreneurs appeared to create gazelles compared to other types of growth firms, may help build theory able to predict the birth of gazelles. Such a theory may assist investors improve their ability to identify major potential opportunities and help governments target support initiatives early on in the life of firms likely to use them to best effect.

5 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5172/ser.15.1.39

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{d2007,
  title        = {{Entrepreneurial founding activities that create gazelles}},
  author       = {D J Cunneen & G. G. Meredith},
  journal      = {Small Enterprise Research},
  year         = {2007},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5172/ser.15.1.39},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Entrepreneurial founding activities that create gazelles

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.