Quality of service in the Jordanian telecommunications sector

Mohammad Alawamleh et al.

International Journal of Management and Network Economics2018https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmne.2018.10016483article
ABDC C
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

This research seeks to examine the quality of service of the three main telecommunications operators (Zain, Orange and Umniah) in Jordan for year 2016 in terms of network, distribution, marketing and sales quality using qualitative data from semi-structured one-to-one interviews with a representative sample of the biggest wholesalers and sub-dealers across Jordan (n = 4,600), and qualitative interviews with key stakeholders (sub-dealers recruited from across the country). The core objective of this research was to examine the performance of the three operators in Jordan. It was found that the national telecommunications market is intensely competitive, and the three predominant operators have varying quality of service in numerous areas. Zain and Orange draw on their international leverage and capital to maintain market share, but the best technical and customer support value is offered by the later market entrant, Umniah, in terms of higher speed internet and better customer service. All firms benefit from high-quality human resources, and face similar challenges in terms of inhibitive taxes on prepaid tariffs and the stringent regulation of the Telecommunications Regulatory Commission.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmne.2018.10016483

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mohammad2018,
  title        = {{Quality of service in the Jordanian telecommunications sector}},
  author       = {Mohammad Alawamleh et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Management and Network Economics},
  year         = {2018},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmne.2018.10016483},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Quality of service in the Jordanian telecommunications sector

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.