arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Termination for convenience, the doctrine of executive necessity and government contracting: Implications for Commonwealth agencies such as Defence

Mark Giancaspro

University of Tasmania Law Review2018article
ABDC B
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

All Australian Government agencies are involved in some form of commercial contracting. As the largest procurement agency in the Commonwealth, the Australian Defence Force (ADF), for example, engag...

Cite this paper

@article{mark2018,
  title        = {{Termination for convenience, the doctrine of executive necessity and government contracting: Implications for Commonwealth agencies such as Defence}},
  author       = {Mark Giancaspro},
  journal      = {University of Tasmania Law Review},
  year         = {2018},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Termination for convenience, the doctrine of executive necessity and government contracting: Implications for Commonwealth agencies such as Defence

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.