How do public agencies respond to budgetary control? A theory of strategic task portfolios in public administration

Jonghoon Lee

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory2026https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muag001article
AJG 4ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

How do public agencies manage diverse programs under limited budgets? Resource constraints force agencies to prioritize tasks, requiring strategic decisions about how to allocate resources effectively. In this article, I develop a game-theoretical model that explores how agencies shape and restructure their task portfolios under budgetary constraints. In response to budget reductions, I argue that agencies reallocate resources by prioritizing more efficient tasks for improved performance within their portfolios. To test my theoretical claims, I analyze an original dataset of antitrust cases filed by the US Antitrust Division (AD) from 1970 to 2019. Using compositional analysis, I find systematic associations between budgetary changes and the AD’s litigation portfolios. Specifically, budget cuts are associated with a higher share of antitrust criminal cases—the most efficient type for improving performance metrics—and with relatively lower shares for other case types. This study offers new insight into how public agencies navigate budgetary constraints to achieve their public missions while meeting performance expectations.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muag001

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jonghoon2026,
  title        = {{How do public agencies respond to budgetary control? A theory of strategic task portfolios in public administration}},
  author       = {Jonghoon Lee},
  journal      = {Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muag001},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How do public agencies respond to budgetary control? A theory of strategic task portfolios in public administration

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.