arbiter
JournalsAccount

Enhancing qualitative research in international business: challenges and best practices from fieldwork to publication

Eriikka Paavilainen‐Mäntymäki & Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki

Critical Perspectives on International Business2025https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-04-2025-0103article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.44

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to address key challenges in conducting qualitative research within international business (IB), focusing on the role of theory, authenticity, theorizing and quality criteria. Design/methodology/approach The paper acknowledges the pluralism inherent in qualitative research and its relevance to IB, identifying four key challenges: (1) positioning theory within qualitative research, (2) maintaining authenticity in research practices, (3) theorizing from qualitative research, and (4) evaluating trustworthiness. The authors offer suggestions based on their experiences to help researchers navigate these challenges. Findings The paper suggests that qualitative IB researchers often struggle due to the lack of standardized methodologies and the complexity introduced by pluralism. However, it emphasizes the potential of qualitative research in IB, particularly for understanding complex, evolving IB phenomena. Research limitations/implications The paper provides suggestions on how to improve the research contributions to IB scholarship by embracing the special characteristics of qualitative research. Practical implications The paper offers operationalizations and examples of how qualitative IB researchers can address the outlined challenges related to the role of theory, authenticity, theorizing, and quality criteria in practice. Social implications The paper brings forth ways of improving qualitative IB research quality, and therefore also increasing its research impact. Originality/value This paper contributes to the growing discourse on pluralism in IB research, offering a comprehensive overview of challenges faced by qualitative researchers. It provides practical advice for overcoming these challenges and advocates for a more inclusive, contextually grounded approach to IB theorizing.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-04-2025-0103

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{eriikka2025,
  title        = {{Enhancing qualitative research in international business: challenges and best practices from fieldwork to publication}},
  author       = {Eriikka Paavilainen‐Mäntymäki & Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki},
  journal      = {Critical Perspectives on International Business},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-04-2025-0103},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Enhancing qualitative research in international business: challenges and best practices from fieldwork to publication

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.