Building Bridges: International Institutions and Syrian Youth in Turkish Higher Education

Özge Onursal-Beşgül

Higher Education Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-026-00442-6article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This article examines the role of international organisations and supranational actors, conceptualised here as international institutions, in disseminating inclusive higher education norms for refugees, with a focus on their influence at the national level in Turkey. Using primary documents and expert interviews, the article analyses how international institutions facilitate the transfer of norms, provide funding and shape policy design in crisis contexts. The findings reveal that international institution-led initiatives in Turkey have supplemented crisis-responsive education frameworks, serving as mechanisms to support Syrian youth and as tools to promote inclusion. The analysis reveals that higher education functions as both a humanitarian response and a strategic policy area. International norms are adapted and negotiated within domestic settings and applied selectively. Overall, the article explains why the diffusion of higher education norms for refugees is incomplete. It reveals how international institutions contribute to shaping national policy during times of crisis, as well as the limitations they face due to domestic political priorities and power relations.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-026-00442-6

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{özge2026,
  title        = {{Building Bridges: International Institutions and Syrian Youth in Turkish Higher Education}},
  author       = {Özge Onursal-Beşgül},
  journal      = {Higher Education Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-026-00442-6},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Building Bridges: International Institutions and Syrian Youth in Turkish Higher Education

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.