arbiter
JournalsAccount

Retraction notice: Developing customer oriented service: a case study

Unknown author

Journal of Service Theory and Practice2026https://doi.org/10.1108/jstp-01-2026-0039article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The publishers of Journal of Service Theory and Practice (formerly known as: Managing Service Quality: An International Journal) wish to retract the article Rahman Z (2004), “Developing customer oriented service: a case study”. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 14 No. 5 pp. 426-435, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520410558029.It has come to our attention that a large proportion of this article is taken, without attribution, from an earlier article: Bhattacharyya, S.K. and Rahman, Z. (2004), “Capturing the customer's voice, the centerpiece of strategy making: A case study in banking”, European Business Review, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 128-138, https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340410524238.The Journal of Service Theory and Practice submission guidelines make it clear that articles must be original and must not infringe any existing copyright. The publishers of the journal sincerely apologize to the readers.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jstp-01-2026-0039

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Retraction notice: Developing customer oriented service: a case study}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {Journal of Service Theory and Practice},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jstp-01-2026-0039},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Retraction notice: Developing customer oriented service: a case study

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.