Consumers Preferences for Presence‐Focused Nutrition Claims in China

J. F. Wang et al.

International Journal of Consumer Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70211article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Highlighting the nutritional value through front‐of‐package nutrition labels is an effective way to make healthier food products stand out in order to attract consumers. However, there is a lack of discussion on presence‐focused nutrition claim (e.g., ‘ high in calcium’ ) compared to absence‐focused nutrition claim (e.g., ‘reduced fat’ ), but the former may be more appealing when making food choices. This study aimed to identify the effects of front‐of‐pack nutrition content claims ( ‘source of’, ‘high in’ ) for protein, calcium, omega‐3 and vitamin D on Chinese consumers' willingness to pay for milk products. The random parameter logit model reveals that nutrition content claims about calcium led to greater acceptance and willingness to pay for the product, followed by omega‐3, protein and vitamin D. The claim ‘high in’ was more attractive than ‘source of’ for all nutrients considered. The latent class model identified four consumer groups based on their nutritional preferences, with heterogeneity explained by psychological factor and actual food intake. In light of these results, strategies emphasizing the calcium content of milk products or targeting ‘high in’ buyers are proposed.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70211

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{j.2026,
  title        = {{Consumers Preferences for Presence‐Focused Nutrition Claims in China}},
  author       = {J. F. Wang et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Consumer Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70211},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Consumers Preferences for Presence‐Focused Nutrition Claims in China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.