Traditional cultural expressions and copyright law: Denoting the long‐lasting confusion

Mariam Aroian

The Journal of World Intellectual Property2025https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12345article
ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Abstract The paper shows that protecting traditional cultural expressions through the scope of copyright law is an erroneous approach and that recognition of folklore should be a separate issue outside of the copyright scope. It examines the key incompatibilities between the individualistic nature of copyright and the collective, culturally embedded nature of TCEs. This research aims to contribute to the debate on how to develop an approach that, firstly, respects and effectively protects the unique nature of TCEs, and secondly, has a greater chance of gaining international acceptance. By drawing on the familiar concepts of attribution and integrity, we can create a new legal framework that addresses the needs of various groups of stakeholders and ensures that TCEs are properly protected both now and in the future. While the concepts of attribution and integrity, as developed in copyright law, cannot be applied directly to TCEs due to their individualistic nature, the paper argues that these concepts offer valuable insights for lawmaking purposes. By drawing from the extensive research in copyright studies, this paper suggests that these insights can guide the development of a sui generis protection system tailored to TCEs.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12345

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mariam2025,
  title        = {{Traditional cultural expressions and copyright law: Denoting the long‐lasting confusion}},
  author       = {Mariam Aroian},
  journal      = {The Journal of World Intellectual Property},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12345},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Traditional cultural expressions and copyright law: Denoting the long‐lasting confusion

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.