Regulatory lag, efficiency, and performance. Lessons from a case study

Carlos Fernando Ceballos Ferroglio et al.

Competition and Regulation in Network Industries2024https://doi.org/10.1177/17835917241251811article
ABDC B
Weight
0.30

Abstract

Our main contribution is to identify the risks implied by the existence of prolonged regulatory lags. We hypothesize that a likely first response is to reduce OPEX, increasing efficiency. If the lag persists for enough time, a vicious circle of inefficiency, disinvestment, and reduced performance can follow. We use a regulatory episode affecting natural gas distributors in Argentina as a natural experiment, controlling with other Latin American countries’ utilities not exposed to the same regulatory stimuli. We evaluate the relative efficiency of fourteen firms for five countries, in seven years, using Stochastic Frontiers Analysis (SFA). Thus, we perform a regulatory impact analysis (RIA) to assess the consequences on the performance of two idiosyncratic regulatory policy instruments applied in the distribution gas industry in Argentina in the 1998–2021 period (the 2002 Public Emergency Law and the 2016 Integral Tariff Review).

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17835917241251811

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{carlos2024,
  title        = {{Regulatory lag, efficiency, and performance. Lessons from a case study}},
  author       = {Carlos Fernando Ceballos Ferroglio et al.},
  journal      = {Competition and Regulation in Network Industries},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17835917241251811},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Regulatory lag, efficiency, and performance. Lessons from a case study

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.30

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.