A Gateway to the Future or a Mind Trapped in Anxiety? The Transformative Power of Career Resources

Emre Emrullah Boğazlıyan & Ahmet Ayaz

Career Development Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.70022article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study explores the indirect impact of employment anxiety on university students’ perceptions of decent work through the serial mediating roles of motivational and environmental career resources. Data were collected from 458 university students in Türkiye using validated scales. Analysis via Hayes' PROCESS macro (Model 6) revealed that while employment anxiety did not directly predict perceptions of future decent work, its indirect effects through motivational and environmental career resources were statistically significant. The results support the hierarchical interaction model of career resources and align with the Psychology of Working Theory (PWT), highlighting the importance of internal psychological capacities and external support systems in shaping career outlooks. Findings underscore the need for integrated career counseling approaches that strengthen individuals’ self‐efficacy and enhance access to environmental supports. The study offers practical implications for developing multilayered career interventions and youth employment policies, particularly in contexts marked by economic uncertainty and high youth unemployment.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.70022

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{emre2026,
  title        = {{A Gateway to the Future or a Mind Trapped in Anxiety? The Transformative Power of Career Resources}},
  author       = {Emre Emrullah Boğazlıyan & Ahmet Ayaz},
  journal      = {Career Development Quarterly},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.70022},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Gateway to the Future or a Mind Trapped in Anxiety? The Transformative Power of Career Resources

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.