arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility and the Carbon Economy: A Case for CSR, the Triple Bottom Line and Obliquity

Sabina Medarevic

Enterprise Governance eJournal2012https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6922article
ABDC C
Weight
0.49

What the paper says

Expenditure in pursuit of the goals of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is increasingly compatible with profit-maximisation. The benefits of adopting CSR can have significant advantages for both shareholders and the environment, particularly when undertaken voluntarily. But another factor in favour of CSR is the oblique pressures brought to bear from a sense of moral obligation, a more ethical approach, sweeping into boardrooms. Obliquity may achieve even more than direct measures.

19 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6922

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sabina2012,
  title        = {{Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility and the Carbon Economy: A Case for CSR, the Triple Bottom Line and Obliquity}},
  author       = {Sabina Medarevic},
  journal      = {Enterprise Governance eJournal},
  year         = {2012},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6922},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility and the Carbon Economy: A Case for CSR, the Triple Bottom Line and Obliquity

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.49

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.36 × 0.4 = 0.14
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.