arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Technology Project Summaries as a Predictor of Crowdfunding Success

Mika Westerlund et al.

Technology Innovation Management Review2022https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1472article
AJG 1
Weight
0.40

What the paper says

IntroductionCrowdfunding has become an important channel for innovators, entrepreneurs, and incumbents to raise funds for developing new technology products and business ideas (Yuan et al., 2016; Kraus et al., 2016; Dushnitsky et al., 2016; Brem et al., 2019; Popescul et al., 2020; Rrustemi & Tuchschmid, 2020; Sahaym et al., 2021).

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1472

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mika2022,
  title        = {{Technology Project Summaries as a Predictor of Crowdfunding Success}},
  author       = {Mika Westerlund et al.},
  journal      = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
  year         = {2022},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1472},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Technology Project Summaries as a Predictor of Crowdfunding Success

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.40

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.14 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.