Towards an Inclusive Risk Management Alternative: An Exploration of Cultural Responsivity of Pakistani Takāful Market

Laiba Nehal Awan et al.

Journal of Islamic Business & Management2025https://doi.org/10.26501/jibm/2025.1501-005article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study is conducted to explore the factors that affect the intention of people from different faiths in adopting Takāful. For this purpose, relevant literature was reviewed, and a preempirical conceptual framework was developed. The framework included the relevant and important constructs, according to which the interview questions were designed and fine-tuned. Method: This study used two of Non-Probability sampling techniques i.e., convenience sampling and purposive sampling. This research is conducted qualitatively; 10 interviews are conducted from policyholders with minority religions and faiths and 5 interviews from Takāful practitioners and experts, a total of 15 interviews, contributed to a substantial amount of data. However, the data was reduced for the purpose of analysis in this piece.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26501/jibm/2025.1501-005

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{laiba2025,
  title        = {{Towards an Inclusive Risk Management Alternative: An Exploration of Cultural Responsivity of Pakistani Takāful Market}},
  author       = {Laiba Nehal Awan et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Islamic Business & Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26501/jibm/2025.1501-005},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Towards an Inclusive Risk Management Alternative: An Exploration of Cultural Responsivity of Pakistani Takāful Market

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.