Is it all in Marshall, still? An appreciation of Marshall’s contribution to modern economics

Suzanne J. Konzelmann et al.

Cambridge Journal of Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beaf017article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.44

Abstract

This Special Issue of the Cambridge Journal of Economics marks the centenary of the death of Alfred Marshall (1842–1924), a founding father of modern economics. The publication of Marshall’s (1890) Principles of Economics is widely acknowledged as having shaped the teaching of economics and economic research in the twentieth century. The Principles helped formalise the discipline and establish the marginalist turn in economics. It is still regarded by many as the foundation stone of neoclassical economics. Yet, as a scholar, Marshall was full of apparent contradictions. Throughout his writings he sought to maintain continuity with the classical tradition of Smith, Ricardo and Marx, while anticipating or developing ideas critical to it, notably in the theory of value and distribution. Marshall subjected the key extant and hitherto non-formalised ideas in mathematical language, and yet he was dismissive both of mathematical formalism, and the notion that economics should be modelled along the lines of sciences such as physics. Instead, Marshall emphasised the social and communitarian elements of production, markets and industrial districts, and famously viewed economics as the ‘study of man in the ordinary business of life’ (Marshall, 1890/2011. Principles of Economics, Book 1, Chapter II, p. 35). He appreciated interdisciplinary perspectives and would often explore interests in sociology and philosophy. This Editorial opens with a portrait of Marshall’s life and times to provide context for his intellectual contributions. It then focuses on some of his less-explored contributions to economics, which are gradually acquiring more interest and importance. It then introduces the papers in the Special Issue, before concluding with some critical reflection on the contemporary relevance of Marshall for policy and areas for scholarly development.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beaf017

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{suzanne2025,
  title        = {{Is it all in Marshall, still? An appreciation of Marshall’s contribution to modern economics}},
  author       = {Suzanne J. Konzelmann et al.},
  journal      = {Cambridge Journal of Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beaf017},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Is it all in Marshall, still? An appreciation of Marshall’s contribution to modern economics

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.